Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

175 Ala. 559

Lowery v. Petree

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1912

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1912-02-18

Heard before Hon. C. P. Almon. Election contest by William J. Lowery against Sidney J. Petree for the office of judge of probate. From a judgment dismissing tlie petition, because of failure to give statutory bond, contestant appeals.

Relies on Wilson v. Duncan · Ex parte Shepherd

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1912-02-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1985

7 state decisions

2019121920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McCLELLAN, J.

¶1There is no motion to dismiss the appeal. The transcript was filed, though belated, during the term to which, in term time, it was by law returnable. In the absence of a motion to dismiss the appeal, we will not, 'under these circumstances, consider its dismissal.

¶2The paper, purporting to be a bond, filed with the statement of contest, did not comply with the requirement of the statute in that particular. — Code 1907, § 470. It should have been conditioned to secure the costs of the contest. Obviously, an attempt, though abortive, was made to comply with the statute as to security for costs. In such case the bond, if defective as a statutory obligation, was amendable. Wilson v. Duncan, 114 Ala. 659, 21 South. 1017. The doctrine, in this particular, of that decision, was reiterated in Ex parte Shephard, 172 Ala. 205, 55 South. 627. The court, therefore, erred in declining to set aside its order of dismissal upon the immediate (thereupon) offer of contestant to perfect the security for costs of contest, to *561conform it to tlie requirement of the statute (section 470) therefor.

¶3The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

All the Justices concur.
/175/ala/559 · .json · Public domain