Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 ARIZ 431 - Batiza v. Superfon

Batiza v. Superfon’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1056 (§ 206 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 33 U.S.C. § 1001

Relies on Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne · MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc. · Houltin v. United States · Fmc Corporation v. Holliday

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.