Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Ariz. 98 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

215
cited by 215 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 203 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 215 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Zamora v. Reinstein (1996), Bilke v. State (2003)

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 203 state decisions

10401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Janson v. Christensen · State v. Korzep · State v. Wagstaff · Martin v. Martin · State v. Lyons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 215 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n interpreting the meaning of a statute . . . [w]e look first to the statute's language. . . .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Given the list of crimes, and the language "against a minor," a fair construction of the statute is that it refers to crimes in which a child is the target of the criminal conduct. That is to say, a dangerous crime against a child is a crime against a child qua child.... This supports the meaning that a crime against a child is a crime against a child as a child or in the capacity of a child.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen an individual targets a person, he or she generally assumes the risk that the victim will turn out to be within a protected age group.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.