Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 B.R. 144 - In Re DeMaggio

In Re DeMaggio’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Milham Key Bank National Association v. P Milham E, Valenti General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. J Valenti E

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

200199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 505 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1961

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green · Marino v. United States · Rake v. Wade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts are generally in agreement that an interest rate to compute present value must be responsive to current economic conditions”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that an unchanging fixed rate established at some prior time is not appropriate in a present value analysis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]nterest rates on delinquent taxes frequently incorporate a punitive aspect to discourage nonpayment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.