In Re McClure’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2021
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on 29 114 75276 Yonikus Yonikus · In Re LaBelle · Casarow v. Evans (In Re Evans) · In Re Cain · Mentzer v. Van Scyoc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o payment, claim, award or decision under this Act shall be assignable or subject to any lien, attachment or garnishment, or be held liable in any way for any lien, debt, penalty or damages”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is difficult to see why the placement of provisions of state law within a particular codification should have the substantive impact for which the trustee argues”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“language is effective to exempt workers' compensation claims from judgments of creditors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Hernandez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.