In Re Cipparone’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2018
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129
Relies on Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee v. U.S. Truck Co. · Matter of Yasparro · In Re Henke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court holds that the 'new value' exception to the absolute priority rule is inapplicable because the proposed contribution comes from the debtors themselves rather than from an outside source.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Summers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.