Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 CALAPP2D 641 - Flanagan v. Flanagan

Flanagan v. Flanagan’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
May 1981
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1981

18 state decisions

1201959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peiser v. Mettler · Gordon v. Perkins · Pascoe v. Baker · Willingham v. Pecora · 84 Cal. App. 516 - San Jose Hospital v. Etherton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Change of venue. The superior court in which the action is pending may change the place of trial in an action from one place to another place in the same judicial district or to a designated place in another judicial district for any of the following reasons: (1) when there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had; (2) when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change; (3) when for any cause the judge is disqualified from acting, but if the judge of another judicial district is assigned to try the action, no change of place of trial need be made; (4) if the court finds that the defendant will be put to unnecessary expense- and inconvenience, and if the court finds that the expense and inconvenience was-intentionally caused, the court may assess-costs against the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.