Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Cal. App. 4th 545 - Consumer Privacy Cases

175 Cal. App. 4th 545 - Consumer Privacy Cases’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 20 Cal. 3d 25 - Serrano v. Priest · General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation 94-1064 94-1194 94-1195 94-1198 94-1202 94-1203 94-1207 94-1208 94-1219 · 22 Cal. 4th 1084 - PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler · 34 Cal. 4th 553 - Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. · Staton v. Boeing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' [Citations] For this reason '[o]ur review of the amount of attorney fees awarded is deferential.' [Citations.] We apply an abuse of discretion standard. [Citation.] Fees approved by the trial court are presumed to be reasonable, and the objectors must show error in the award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “experienced trial judge is the best judge of the value of professional services rendered in his court, and while his judgment is of course subject to review, it will not be disturbed unless the appellate court is convinced that it is clearly wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “' [¶] We also start from the proposition that the '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.