Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Colo. 421 - People v. Vigil

People v. Vigil’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
5
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2011

22 state decisions

18019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chimel v. California · Johnson v. United States · Preston v. United States · Chapman v. United States · Trupiano v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he strong odor of burning marijuana, and the smoke emerging from the doorway . . . was sufficient to constitute probable cause for . . . arrest on the illegal possession and use charge. See U.S. v. King, 305 F. Supp. 630 (1969); People v. Erb, 128 Ill. App. 2d 126 , 261 N.E.2d 431 (1970).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.