Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 CONN 204 - State v. Rossier

State v. Rossier’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Hinckley (1985), State v. Januszewski (1980)

51 state decisions

38019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Evans · Corallo v. United States · State v. Holmquist · State v. Rose · State v. Jeustiniano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough it may often be difficult to distinguish between the two, such a distinction must be drawn; a person can be found guilty of assault in the first degree under ... § 53a-59 [a] [1] only if he 'causes serious physical injury to another person.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'Serious physical injury' means physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] person is guilty of CT Page 15462 threatening when . . . [b]y physical threat, he intentionally places or attempts to place another person in fear of imminent serious physical injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.