Holman v. Thomas

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1910.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1910-01-17

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1910

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Holman v. Thomas

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

On motion by attorney for defendants to withdraw · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1910-01-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.

¶2On motion by attorney for defendants to withdraw.

¶3See, also, 171 Fed. 219.

¶4Before LACOMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This court must decline to interfere in any way with the relations between defendants’ counsel and his clients. Whether he shall con- - tinue to act for them or shall withdraw from the case is a matter for him to determine at his own risk.