Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.1d 495 - In re Terens

In re Terens’s Empirical Analysis

175 F. 495 · 1910

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
October 1915
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Case v. Beauregard · Fitzpatrick v. Flannagan · Huiskamp v. Moline Wagon Co. · Bulger v. . Rosa · Sargent v. Blake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"With the property in custody and all the parties present, and no rights of innocent purchasers or transferees having Intervened, a court of general equity powers would concedodly award priority to Lippincott, because there had been no application of the property, with the consent of the partners, to the payment of individual debts, ;s * * because hippincott In his own right as a partnership creditor- would Ire entitled to equity’s rule of distribution, and because Swigert for Ills own protection would have the right to ask that Lippincott be first paid.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.