Hohl v. Lloyd’s Empirical Analysis
175 F. 544 · 1910
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2007
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hart v. Pennsylvania Railroad · Calderon v. Atlas Steamship Co. · Cau v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. · United States Lace Curtain Mills v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. · Kellogg v. Maloney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is competent for a steamship company as a carrier of goods to limit its liability” to a certain amount “in case of loss, even as against its own negligence,” where the valuation “is the basis on which freight is charged, and [this fact] was fully known to the shipper.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Not accountable Cor any sum exceeding $100 per package for goods of whatever description, nor for any amount in respect of gold, silver, etc., * * * unless the value of such be herein expressed and freight as may be agreed paid thereon.” , . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.