Ruggles v. Buckley’s Empirical Analysis
175 F. 57 · 1910
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1935
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Godfrey v. White · Maynard v. Richards · Griggs v. Clark · Dunlap v. Watson · Loomis v. Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We see no force in this insistence. The result to Ruggles is the same, whether the receiver employed Buckley or some one else. Moreover, Buckley rendered these services under an express agreement for compensation, while Ruggles rendered his services without any such agreement, and without any expectation on the part of any of the persons in interest to allow him compensation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ruggles v. Buckley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.