Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.1d 756 - Horton v. Stegmyer

Horton v. Stegmyer’s Empirical Analysis

175 F. 756 · 1910

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 1967
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1967

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

60191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Company · Dougherty v. Nevada Bank · National Surety Co. v. State Bank · Wallace v. Long · Kelley v. Boettcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A federal court sitting in equity has jurisdiction to) disregard or to enjoin the enforcement of an unconscionable judgment of a state or of a national court for new causes, such as fraud, accident, or mistake, which deceive the court into a wrong decree, or which prevent the judgment defendant from availing himself of a meritorious defense that was not fairly presented to the court which rendered the judgment. But it has no pow er to take such action on account of errors or irregularities in the proceedings on which the judgment or decree is founded, or on account of erroneous or illegal decisions by the court which rendered the judgment or decree. The reason of this rule is that cases of the former class present new controversies, which have never been raised in other courts, while eases of the latter class invoke a jurisdiction which does not exist, a jurisdiction in a federal court to review and revise the acts and decisions of courts of coordinate jurisdiction upon questions which they have lawfully considered and adjudged.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.