Falkenberg v. Bernard Edward Co.’s Empirical Analysis
175 F.2d 427 · 1949
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Cuno Engineering Corporation v. Automatic Devices Corporation · Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Mercoid Corporation v. Mid-Continent Inv Co · Mercoid Corporation v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co · Chicago Steel Foundry Co. v. Burnside Steel Foundry Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No sound legalistic basis has been found, after an extensive study of the record before us, warranting deviation from the Hazeltine explanation [of Graver] and application of Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.