Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.2d 504 - Works v. United States

Works v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.2d 504 · 1949

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1978

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

401949195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States · United States v. Standard Oil Co. · United States v. Allegheny County Pa · Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United States · United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘If the seller’s performance fulfills his obligation in regard to the quality of goods, whether because he has made no promises or warranties in regard to their quality or because those which he did make have been fulfilled, no question can .arise as to his liability.’ ” 175 F. 2d at 509 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.