Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.2d 558 - In re Hooker

In re Hooker’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.2d 558 · 1949

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
November 1967
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on In re Gray · In re Carr · In re Stern · In re Horton · In re Stacy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Not only will terms in claims be interpreted broadly, but also limitations not expressed in the claims, though adequately stated in the specification, will not be read into the claim in order to avoid anticipation in the prior art.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.