Rivers v. Bauer

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued June 16, 1949.

Decided July 29, 1949.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-07-29

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1951

3 counsel of record

Relies on Tilton v. Nunan · Rivers v. Bauer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-07-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Raymond Pace Alexander, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

¶2Leon Fox, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for the United States.

¶3Harry R. Axelroth, Philadelphia, Pa. (Axelroth & Porteous, on the brief), for defendants.

¶4Before BIGGS, Ohief Judge, and Mc-LAUGHLIN and O’CONNELL, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the arguments of the parties in the instant appeal convinces us that the court below rendered a correct decision. 79 F.Supp. 403. As to damages see our decision in Walshaw, Administratrix, v. Irwin, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 184. As to damages for loss of consortium alleged by the husband plaintiff the evidence demonstrates this to have been too nebulous to warrant reversal. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.