Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.2d 791 - In re Johnson

In re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.2d 791 · 1949

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
April 1979
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 1979 · most notably Thabet Manufacturing Company, D.B.A. American Beauty Ventilated Aluminum Awning Company v. Kool Vent Metal Awning Corporation of America (1955), In re Laverne (1966)

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2501949195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gorham Company v. White · Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co. · A. C. Gilbert Co. v. Shemitz · In re Faustmann · Imperial Glass Co. v. Heisey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While patentable designs may result from regrouping familiar forms and decorations, the substitution of a slightly different form already in use in articles of the class to which the design is applied, does not merit a monopoly. [Emphasis added.] [Citing Imperial Glass Co. v. A. H. Heisey & Co., 6 Cir., 294 F. 267 .]””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that the degree of difference [from the prior art] required to establish a patentable distinction occurs when the average observer takes the new design for a different, and not a modified, already-existing design.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “obvious expedients to a designer skilled in the art.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.