Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.2d 886 - Woods v. Kaye

Woods v. Kaye’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.2d 886 · 1949

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
February 1987
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1987

14 federal appellate ·

13019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yakus v. United States · Bowles v. Willingham · Lockerty v. Phillips · Woods v. Stone · Bowles v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] person should not be permitted to retain that which is illegally acquired even through a mistake of legality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.