Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.3d 1312 - United States v. Hedges

United States v. Hedges’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.3d 1312 · 1999

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Beckles (2009), United States v. Olis (2005)

12 federal appellate ·

2201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77E (§ 5 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)

Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Jones · United States v. Morrill · United States v. Lawrence · United States v. Mahique

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “these statements were undisputed, and the court was permitted to rely on them despite the absence of supporting evidence”). 4 . While the pre-sentence report indicated that Brown and Stewart wired $5,315,500 to Morris' account, Morris’ counsel filed objections to the pre-sentence report stating that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.