Hendler v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
175 F.3d 1374 · 1999
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Glendale Federal Bank, FSB v. United States (2001), Bluebonnet Savings Bank Fsb Stone Capital Inc James Fail v. United States (2001)
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council · Bauman v. Ross · United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to determine whether [the lower court's decision] is premised on errors of law or clearly erroneous factual findings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a regulation categorically prohibits all economically beneficial use of land there is, without more, a compensable taking. See Florida Rock, 18 F.3d at 1564-65 . On the other hand, though it is not necessary to have a total wipeout before the Constitution compels compensation, if the regulatory action is not shown to have had a negative economic impact on the property, there is no regulatory taking. See generally id. at 1569-71; Loveladies, 28 F.3d at 1180 . The question of the economic impact of a particular regulatory action is of course fact-specific to the case. See Florida Rock, 18 F.3d at 1570 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.