Cabrera v. Barbo’s Empirical Analysis
175 F.3d 307 · 1999
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Fredric Jermyn v. Martin Horn Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (2001), Bronshtein v. Horn (2005)
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · Harris v. Reed · Lambrix v. Singletary · State v. Fritz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a petitioner should be on notice of how to present his claims in the state courts if his failure to present them is to bar him from advancing them in a federal court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]hese conditions must have existed at the time of the state court procedural default.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.