Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.3d 444 - Kincade v. Sparkman

Kincade v. Sparkman’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.3d 444 · 1999

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
August 2004
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · United States v. Leon · Angel v. Overberg · United States v. Reliford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the degree to which the remarks complained of have a tendency to mislead the jury and prejudice the accused; whether they are isolated or extensive; whether they were deliberately or accidentally placed before the jury, and the strength of the competent proof to establish the guilt of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “find that the prosecutor's comments constituted more than simply trial error under state law. The misconduct must be 'so fundamentally unfair as to deny [the defendant] due process.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.