Haggard v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
175 F.3d 591 · 1999
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Prosch v. Apfel (2000), Goff v. Barnhart (2005)
20 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Polaski v. Heckler · Woolf v. Shalala · Smith v. Shalala · Roe v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A vocational expert's testimony `based on a properly phrased hypothetical question constitutes substantial evidence.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goff v. Barnhart · Page v. Astrue“Our role on review is to determine whether the Commissioner's findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Page v. Astrue“Substantial evidence is relevant evidence which a reasonable mind would accept as adequate to support the Commissioner's conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Page v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.