Gilbert v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
175 F.3d 602 · 1999
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2013
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · House v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In posing hypothetical questions to a vocational expert, an ALJ must include all impairments he finds supported by the administrative record”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he testimony of a vocational expert is relevant at steps four and five of the Commissioner's sequential analysis . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.