Hutton v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
175 F.3d 651 · 1999
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably William B. Johnson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security (2001), Bob Mittlestedt v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security (2000)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Polaski v. Heckler · McCoy v. Schweiker · Woolf v. Shalala · Kelley v. Callahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Impairments that are controllable or amenable to treatment do not support a finding of total disability.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“In determining whether the existing evidence is substantial, we must consider evidence that detracts from the [Commissioner’s] decision as well as evidence that supports it. We may not reverse the Commissioner’s decision merely because substantial evidence exists in the record that would have supported a contrary outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Testimony from a VE based on a properly-phrased hypothetical question constitutes substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garza v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.