Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.3d 89 - Campos-Orrego v. Rivera

Campos-Orrego v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.3d 89 · 1999

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. (1999), Faigin v. Kelly (1999)

37 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions

4801999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Paul v. Davis · Carey v. Piphus · Dimick v. Schiedt · McCoy v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must furnish the court with the raw materials necessary to the due performance of the appellate task”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Jackson v. ING Bank, FSB · In Re Vazquez Laboy
  2. “it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to make a timely request for nominal damages”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Ronald Alexander · Oliver v. Falla
  3. “We have reiterated, with a regularity bordering on the echolalic, that a party's failure to advance an issue in the nisi prius court ordinarily bars consideration of that issue on appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. United States v. Rivera-Rodríguez · In Re Pharm. Industry Average Wholesale Price Lit.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.