Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 F.3d 915 - Hill v. Moore

Hill v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

175 F.3d 915 · 1999

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2016

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Kotteakos v. United States · Coleman v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence [of mitigation] petitioner proffered ... regarding his drug use the day of the murder is largely irrelevant.... Petitioner has not, and cannot, show that there was any measurable amount of cocaine in his blood. In the end, the only evidence he has proffered that would support his claim that he was intoxicated during the robbery is the statement of his accomplice that they had been using drugs that day. That evidence is insufficient to demonstrate a reasonable probability that, had counsel put that evidence before the jury, it would not have recommended, and the trial court would not have imposed, a death sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he defendant was an accomplice in the capital felony committed by another person and his participation was relatively minor,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.