United States v. Hammel

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 17, 2006

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-04-17

Relies on Are Sikeston Limited Partnership v. Weslock National Inc

Decided 2006-04-17

PER CURIAM.

¶1Floyd and Rose Hammel appeal the district court’s1 in rem judgment and decree of foreclosure granting summary judgment in favor of the government. We have carefully reviewed the record and consid*787ered the parties’ arguments, and find no basis for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned opinion. See ARE Sikeston Ltd. P’ship v. Weslock Nat’l, Inc., 120 F.3d 820, 827 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review).

¶2Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

¶3. The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.