Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 FRD 646 - Cable & Computer Technology, Inc. v. Lockheed Saunders, Inc.

Cable & Computer Technology, Inc. v. Lockheed Saunders, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2017

1 district ·

80199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · Schlagenhauf v. Holder · Trevino v. Celanese Corp. · In Re Convergent Technologies Securities Litigation · Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “|T]he phrase "contention interrogatory” is used imprecisely to refer to many different kinds of questions. Some people would classify as a contention interrogatory any question that asks another party to indicate what it contends____Another kind of question ... asks an opposing party to state all the facts on which it bases some specified contention. Yet another form of this category of interrogatory asks an opponent to state all the evidence on which it bases some specified contention. Some contention interrogatories ask the responding party to take a position, and then to explain or defend that position, with respect to how the law applies to facts. A variation on this theme involves interrogatories that ask parties to spell out the legal basis for, or theory behind, some specified contention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.