175 F. Supp. 2d 24 - Cobell v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “1. Failing to comply with the Court’s Order of December 21, 1999, to initiate a Historical Accounting Project. 2. Committing a fraud on the Court by concealing the Department’s true actions regarding the Historical Accounting Project during the period from March 2000, until January 2001. 3. Committing a iraud on the Court by failing to disclose ‘the true status of the TAAMS project between September 1999 and December 21,1999. 4. Committing a fraud on the Court by filing false and misleading quarterly status reports starting in March 2000, regarding TAAMS and BIA Data Clean-up.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 226 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Cobell v. Norton

2. “5. Committing a fraud on the Court by making false and misleading representations starting in March, 2000, regarding computer security of IIM trust data.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 226 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Cobell v. Norton