175 F. Supp. 3d 616 - Emami v. Bolden’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on United States v. Mitchell · Osborn v. Haley · Adams v. Bain · Kerns v. United States · Borneman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wanted to get his subordinate fired and used improper means, perhaps even defamation, to reach that end”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“squarely within that supervisor's scope of employment under Virginia law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a supervisor who, for simply personal reasons”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.