Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 GA 365 - Holmes v. Maddox

Holmes v. Maddox’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1975
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1975

5 state decisions

2019321940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Where any suit shall be . . . defended by . . . the personal representative of a deceased person, the opposite party shall not be admitted to testify in his own favor against the . . . deceased person as to transactions or communications with such . . . deceased person ...” This statute would eliminate the testimony of appellant since he is the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.