¶1The motion for a new trial in this case contains only the usual general grounds. After an examination of the evidence, the court is of the opinion that the verdict rendered by the jury was authorized • by the evidence, and the discretion of the court in refusing a new trial will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.
175 Ga. 461
Rogers v. Rogers
Decided August 15, 1932
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1932-08-15
Decided 1932-08-15