Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Ga. App. 207 - Hambrick v. State

175 Ga. App. 207 - Hambrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2002

7 state decisions

50198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Jackson v. Denno · Swain v. State of Alabama · State v. Eubanks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen an appellate court reviews the merits of a special demurrer after trial has been held and no prejudice to appellant has occurred even though the indictment is not perfect, “reversal is a mere windfall to defendant and contributes nothing to the administration of justice.” State v. Eubanks, 239 Ga. 483, 489 ( 238 SE2d 38 ) (1977).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.