Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Ga. App. 760 - Ewing v. Johnston

175 Ga. App. 760 - Ewing v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 178 Ga. App. 742 - Whisnant v. State (1986), Demoski v. New (1987)

34 state decisions

1701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Abujasen v. United States · Colorado v. Franc · Lovejoy v. Tidwell · Shockey v. Baker · 85 Ga. App. 292 - Ellison v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[t]he statutory right to judgment following default is not an indefeasible right, but may or may not be asserted ([cits.]), and may be waived by a plaintiff by proceeding with the action without taking advantage of his right to judgment in a timely and proper manner. [Cits.] Such waiver need not be expressed, but may be implied in law by conduct or circumstances inconsistent with the right to judgment. [Cits.] Acts which have been held to constitute waiver include: . . . joining issue upon the pleadings ([cit.]), going to trial on the merits ([cit.]), or announcing ready for trial and introducing evidence on the merits ([Cit.]). . . . [T]hese indicia of waiver are present in the instant case.” Ewing v. Johnston, 175 Ga. App. 760, 764-765 (1) ( 334 SE2d 703 ) (1985).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “statutory right to judgment following default”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.