175 Ill. App. 3d 714 - Smith v. Menet’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 84 Ill. 2d 186 - Wilson v. Clark · 60 Ill. 2d 418 - Borowski v. Von Solbrig · 133 Ill. App. 3d 119 - Barreto v. City of Waukegan · 111 Ill. App. 3d 401 - Moore v. Farmers Insurance Exchange · Forest Preserve District v. Lehmann Estate, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'normally in a circumstance where there’s an abnormal test and a patient does not follow up on it,-either (sic) an attempt is made to reschedule the patient. If the patient cannot be contacted, then at least a letter is sent out to the address of last note on the record. Beyond that, I don’t think a physician can chase after the patient, but certainly that notification, either by phone or mail, is indicated.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.