Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 IND 10 - Hinesley v. Crum

Hinesley v. Crum’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2012

6 state decisions

2019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. Tutt · Clay v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. · Conner v. Woodfill · Culbertson v. Knight · Beery v. Driver

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.