Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Ind. App. 543 - Lane v. State

175 Ind. App. 543 - Lane v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2017

20 state decisions

7019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ortiz v. State · Ritchie v. State · 157 Ind. App. 59 - Guyton v. State · 60 Ohio App. 39 - Reliance Art Metal, Inc. v. Western Bank & Trust Co. · Vaughn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal this Court may order a modification of the judgment of conviction to that of a lesser included offense because of an insufficiency of evidence on a particular element of the crime. [Citation omitted].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[T]he appellant’s attack on the sufficiency of the evidence is only directed to the element of the value of the stolen goods. While the evidence and the reasonable inferences therefrom fail to prove value of $100 or more, the nature of the stolen items (a television set and room air conditioner) admits some inherent value albeit less than $100. Thus, the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction for the lesser and included offense of theft of property valued at less than $100.... ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.