175 Ind. App. 636 - Antrup v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. State · Zupp v. State · Hitch v. State · Dipert v. State · Hackett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although [appellant’s] motion [to correct error] and supporting memorandum lack specificity, we are able to glean from his brief and from the record the gist of his arguments. We eschew deciding cases on technicalities; we prefer deciding cases on their merits .. . “Furthermore, while the motion to correct errors serves as the complaint on appeal, its primary purpose is to afford the trial court the opportunity to rectify errors it has committed . ... ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.