Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Kan. 134 - Berndt v. Berndt

Berndt v. Berndt’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1971
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hayn v. Hayn · Gates v. Gates · Walno v. Walno · Tuley v. Tuley · Harris v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the provisions of G. S. 1949, 60-1511, when a husband is granted a divorce by reason of the fault or aggression of the wife, the division of property to be made between the parties, irrespective whether such property has been jointly acquired or is the separate property of the husband, is a matter which rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial court. “A division of property made by the trial court in a divorce action will not be disturbed unless it is clearly shown that there was an abuse of discretion.” (Syl. ¶|1, 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.