Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Kan. 25 - Justice v. Lockett

Justice v. Lockett’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1990

14 state decisions

8019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182

Relies on 126 W. Va. 557 - Cassis v. Fair · Jones v. Morrow · Powell v. Turner · James v. Amrine · In re Hess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . the courts of the asylum state have no right to consider the merits of the trial of a person sought to be extradited, or any questions pertaining to his guilt or innocence, or whether his constitutional rights were violated leading to his conviction, but can consider only question of asylum state’s obligation to surrender him upon the governor’s warrant. . . .” (p. 31.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The guilt or innocence of the accused as to the crime of which he is charged may not be inquired into by the governor or in any proceeding after the demand for extradition accompanied by a charge of crime in legal form as above provided shall have been presented to the governor, except as it may be involved in identifying the person held as the person charged with the crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.