Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Kan. 293 - Smeltzer v. Smeltzer

Smeltzer v. Smeltzer’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1965
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tuley v. Tuley · Walton v. Walton · Frye v. Frye · Thornbrugh v. Thornbrugh · May v. May

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Corroborating testimony must pertain to the statutory grounds upon which a divorce may be obtained and mere corroboration of indignities and abuses which do not justify a divorce is insufficient to support a decree.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.