State v. McManaman’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 1971
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Hawk v. Olson · Tomkins v. State of Missouri · State v. Zeilinger · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Specifications of error not included in the grounds of a motion for a new trial and called to the trial court’s attention cannot be considered on an appeal from a conviction in a criminal action.” (Syl. f 1.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stewart · State v. Haught““Insofar as it is claimed there was error in the trial court’s refusal to compel the state to elect on which count it would proceed and rely is concerned, we repeat that if there was any error it was a trial error.” (p. 36.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.