State v. Messmore’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 1994 · most notably Johnson v. Crouse (1963), State v. Stubbs (1965)
6 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Woodman · Scott v. Hudspeth · State v. Morris · State v. Mosley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . Alleged errors not fairly presented to a trial court for ruling form no basis for reversible error on appellate review. (State v. Morris, 124 Kan. 505 , 260 Pac. 629 ; State v. Mosley, 163 Kan. 530, 532 , 183 P. 2d 877 .)” (p. 357.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Teter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.