Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Kan. 373 - State v. Martin

State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
4
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 1996 · most notably State v. Brown (1957), State v. McDaniel & Owens (1980)

30 state decisions

14019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Neff · State v. Aspinwall · State v. Davis · State v. Simmons · State v. Aldrich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . Several separate and distinct felonies may be charged in separate counts of one and the same information, where all of the offenses charged are of tire same general character, requiring the same mode of trial, the same kind of evidence, and the same kind of punishment . . . The defendant may be tried upon all the several counts of the information at one and the same time, and in one trial; but all this rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial court. In some cases the trial court might, without committing material error, quash such an information; or it might require the state to elect upon which one or more of the several counts it would proceed to trial or rely for a verdict; but we cannot say that in this case the court abused its discretion or committed any material error.” (p. 892.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Brown

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.