Crowder v. Lindbergh’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The rule is that to obtain a review of questions depending on the evidence the burden is on the appellant to produce a transcript containing sufficient evidence to establish his position beyond question. This he may do by a complete transcript or by a partial one on agreement between the parties that it contains all evidence material to the issues. . . . Moreover, without a transcript containing all evidence material to the issues there would be no sufficient record to which an appellee could turn in order to properly prepare his counter abstract.” (p. 554.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Larsen v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.

2. ““Appellant contends the court committed various trial errors and rendered an erroneous judgment. Appellant, however, has appealed only from the judgment rendered and not from the order overruling its motion for a new trial. It follows alleged trial errors are not reviewable. (Hardman Lumber Co. v. Spitznaugle, 130 Kan. 346 , 286 Pac. 235 ; Smith v. Kansas Transport Co., 172 Kan. 26 , 238 P. 2d 553 .)” (p.672.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. McCarty v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co.