Dougherty v. Dougherty’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1989
2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Milholland v. Whalen · Ghingher v. Fanseen · Pope v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. · Sieling v. Sieling · Bollack v. Bollack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whether a trust has been perfectly created is largely a question of fact in each case, and the court, in determining the fact, will give effect to the situation and relation of the parties, the nature and situation of the property, and the purposes or objects which the settlor had in view.” Dougherty v. Dougherty, 175 Md. 441, 448 , 2 A. 2d 433 (1938).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Killen v. Houser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.